Does marketing really influence awards success, or is talent enough?

When awards season comes around, the debate resurfaces. Is great work enough to stand on its own, or does the work behind the scenes shape what gets shortlisted, nominated and in the end, celebrated?

For Irish filmmakers, musicians and the teams supporting them, awards recognition can change careers and open doors that previously would have been shut. Understanding what genuinely influences that outcome matters.

Awards are not decided by an AI bot. Voters are human. They are busy, distracted and exposed to an overwhelming volume of content. In that environment, visibility plays a decisive role. Research into awards campaigning, particularly around the Oscars and Grammys, consistently shows a link between sustained promotional activity and nominations. Not because marketing creates quality, but because it ensures quality is noticed, remembered and placed in context.

Take film. The Banshees of Inisherin succeeded because it was a strong piece of work, but it was also supported properly. Festival premieres, consistent press, talent interviews and carefully timed reminders kept it present in the conversation for months. That consistency matters. Without it, even well reviewed films can quietly disappear once the initial buzz fades (sorry, we had to)!

The same pattern appears across Irish cinema more broadly. Films that perform well internationally tend to follow a familiar rhythm. Early exposure, critical endorsement, then a steady stream of thoughtful promotion. This is not hype. It is narrative management. It helps voters understand why a piece of work matters and why it deserves attention alongside hundreds of others competing for the same space.

Music follows a similar logic. Artists like Hozier or Fontaines D.C. did not rely on releases alone. Each album cycle was supported by selective media appearances, live performances, cultural positioning and a clear sense of identity. By the time awards bodies take notice, the story is already established. The work is familiar, credible and culturally present.

This dynamic translates directly to brands and products.

Strong marketing can drive early performance, even when the product itself is flawed. History is full of examples….if we speak….In the short term, attention and demand can be manufactured. Over time, reality catches up. Reviews surface, word of mouth spreads and trust in the product just vanishes .

It is the age old story of the difference between marketing & branding.

Marketing gets people through the door. Branding decides whether they stay.

One creates attention quickly, the other earns belief slowly. When marketing runs ahead of branding, expectations rise faster than reality can meet them. When branding is strong, marketing simply gives it a microphone.

The brands that endure understand the balance. Apple, Patagonia and similar examples pair disciplined storytelling with products that deliver. Marketing does not invent value. It amplifies it. The same principle applies to awards. Campaigning does not replace craft, but it shapes how that craft is perceived and prioritised.

There is also a social layer that cannot be ignored. Conversation creates credibility. When films, albums or brands are being discussed across press, social and industry circles, they signal relevance. Silence, even around strong work, is often misread as a lack of momentum.

For brands, the lesson is clear. Marketing can create attention, desire and early momentum, but it cannot carry a weak product indefinitely. The work that lasts, and the work that gets recognised, is built when substance and storytelling work in tandem. Get the product right, then invest in how it is seen, and Marketing Network Group will help you earn that trust, reputation and long-term value. Album, movie or brand….